The technology it uses to index the web can understand the context surrounding each page and the concepts driving search requests (BBC)
Itâ€™s founded by some ex-Google engineers, so I thought Iâ€™d check it out. They say
Cuil searches more pages on the Web than anyone elseâ€”three times as many as Google and ten times as many as Microsoft.
Rather than rely on superficial popularity metrics, Cuil searches for and ranks pages based on their content and relevance. When we find a page with your keywords, we stay on that page and analyze the rest of its content, its concepts, their inter-relationships and the pageâ€™s coherency. (Cuil)
One thing not â€˜cuilâ€™ (itâ€™s pronounced â€˜coolâ€™ apparently) about it, is that my name doesnâ€™t come up first! Iâ€™m quite sure how, but I am first on Google, which is rather nice.
OK, but thatâ€™s a rather biased test, I have to agree that Iâ€™m not the most important â€˜Julian Hopkinsâ€™ aroundâ€¦ on the other hand, why does this result, where there are unconnected â€˜Julianâ€™ and â€˜Hopkinsâ€™ in it come up before me?
I came across this though, someone referring to something I wrote in an email list in 2000! Another reminder that â€˜the internet does not forget!â€™ Donâ€™t put anything online that you wouldnâ€™t want your parents, (future) employers, or even your children to read!
On page 8, some links to the Air-l list which I have contributed to.â€¦ At page 10 I stopped looking, the last one did not even have â€˜julianâ€™ in it â€¦
It seems a bit slower than Google (not good). Although the pages donâ€™t seem to have as much info on them, they do â€“ returning 10 results per page which is the same as Google. Cuil has little pictures which are not necessary, if you ask me. Here's a screen shot for a search for "Malaysia Today". It comes up with RPK as you'd expect with Google, but a problem here is that 6 out 10 results are from the same website - not very useful...
Continue reading "New search engine â€“ is Cuil cool?" »